For decades there has been a push to eliminate meat from our diet. First it was the non-stop message meat is bad for your health (Hummm, weren’t coffee and butter supposed to be bad-but now they are not?). Then the sustainablists backed by the United Nations argued meat was bad for the environment. Of course, to believe meat is bad for the environment you have to believe Global Warming is occurring, that carbon dioxide and methane are the culprits, and that doing all of this hocus-pocus to reduce man’s production of greenhouse gases will really make a difference-especially since the largest producer of greenhouse gases, China, is doing nothing to control their production.
If you buy all of these assumptions, what the heck, feel free to eat all the maggots you want-as long as you do not force them on the rest of us! Besides, it just leaves more meat for the meat lovers! To learn more about the fast-growing trend to ditch meat and embrace insects click on this link.
Oh, yeh, if this article has made you hungry and you want to buy some yummy maggots click on this link. Bon appétit!
YouTube is attempting to slap the wrist of users who try to cast doubt on Climate Change/Global Warming by posting a statement that basically says, the science is decided and the planet is warming. No mention of the fact there is reliable data from scientists showing currently the planet is instead cooling.
Also worth mentioning is YouTube’s source for its Global Warming statement; Wikipedia. Even Wikipedia admits it is not a reliable source of information! How ironic YouTube says it is posting its statement supporting Global Warming to prevent misinformation on the topic, yet uses a totally unreliable source of information, Wikipedia, to do so.
To read more of this shameful effort by YouTube to discourage free speech and the speaking of truth to power on the subject of Global Warming, click on this link.
Everyone should agree a great many factors in combination create climate. Climate is not a simple phenomenon. So, when Progressives insist the science of Climate Change is settled and is caused by man producing green-house gases, anyone with a brain should cringe. To assume carbon dioxide and methane produced by MAN’S activities have such a massive impact on climate they can over-ride all the other natural factors capable of driving climate change is way too simplistic. This relatively short article is much more fact based making the very important take-always at the end of the article about the threat, or lack of threat, of climate warming ring true. Please learn more by clicking on this link.
(Note: Please do not let the “Abstract” section under the graph scare you away. Skip down below it to the meat of the article.)
As readers of the Agenda21course.com website, you are aware that the 1992 treaty, Agenda for the 21st Century, was never ratified by the U.S. Senate, but because it was signed by President Bush the Elder, it could, through Executive Order, then be implemented through the many virulent agencies of the federal government.
Fast forward to April of 2016 when Secretary of State John Kerry signed for President Obama the United Nations’ Paris Climate Accord. The accord is aimed at slowing the (fictitious) crisis of global warming. Obama and company will attempt this time around to avoid involving Congress in the matter. Hence calling it an “accord” rather than a “treaty”. This would set up a similar scenario to the Agenda 21 treaty in that items within the accord would be turned into soft law through executive orders and the use of the federal agencies. This makes it doubly important, if the Senate is to block these efforts, the Senate is made aware of the threat this accord poses to the United States. Please read this article to learn what YOU can DO to make a difference by clicking on this link.
In November (2014) the legislators in Washington D.C., both old and new, were given a mandate to stop the left’s redistributive and green agenda. Now that the lame duck session is over, it is time for the Republicans to get to work.
On January 21, 2015 the work began. The Senate Republicans, through a series of amendments revolving around the Keystone Pipeline legislation, eventually voted to agree the climate was changing, but would not be maneuvered into saying that the change was being driven by man’s activity.
To read more about the tricky maneuvering used to sidestep the left’s attempt to legitimatize Climate Change, follow this link.
NOTE: Remember, President Bush the Elder, a Republican, signed the treaty Agenda for the 21st Century (aka Agenda 21). While we must be happy the Republicans this time resisted the efforts to blame man for climate change, we must stay vigilant to keep the Republican Party consistent in its efforts to resist sustainable development policies.
After reading Republicans Outfox Democrats on Climate Votes, you might find it interesting to read this same story as written by an in-the-tank-for-Agenda 21 reporter.
Things to note are…
1. In the article Republicans Outfox Democrats on Climate Votes the term “climate change” was used. In this article the term “global warming” is used. This is important because only if the left convinces us that the climate is warming, can greenhouse gases be taxed and used to finance the left’s slimy schemes, and, even more important, can the control of all human behavior be justified.
2) The photo that starts the story is there for only one reason; to tug at your heart-strings. Remember that one of the left’s goals, as presented in the EPA internal memo of 2009, is to appeal to our emotions-not our logic.
3) The author wants you to believe data provided by NASA and NOAA- even though these folks have a track record of playing fast and loose with climate data in order to keep the money flowing to them from D.C.
4) The quote from President Obama saying, “No challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change”, besides being one of the lesser problems on the globe, is yet another example of how the left appeals to the emotions of the listener rather than to logic.
Other than that, it is a great article (sarcasm intended), as you will see if you follow this link.
This is the second lesson in a series of ten lessons on Agenda 21, commonly known as Sustainable Development. Today you will learn how…
Indoctrination is used to soften up the American citizen to make them receptive to the transformation of a free world into a socialist, sustainable development world. Think of all the commercial and nature shows you have seen pushing the green agenda; think of all the articles our biased media create pushing the green agenda, even various churches push the 3 E’s. Continue reading