This March 27, 2013 article discusses a proposal to establish over the next five years wildlife corridors in Washington State. Keep in mind, to admit there are corridors, means that there must be cores, or what would be the point of corridors? Further, as usual for those pushing Agenda 21 policies, climate change, which is used as the justification for these corridors, is discussed as if climate change is a proven fact. Welcome to your future. To read more: link
Tag Archives: grants
Some government regulations that are made with good intentions still lead to bad results. The Endangered Species Act is a good example of such a law. In this short video, economics professor Don Boudreaux examines the Endangered Species Act, and uses it to explain how policymakers’ good intentions sometimes go awry. While the law intends to preserve threatened animals, it actually has the effect of giving landowners strong reasons to kill any endangered species they find on their property. This phenomenon is known as “shoot, shovel, and shut up.” Boudreaux implores us not to judge a policy by its intentions, but by its results. We can’t assume a policy will be good just because the intentions of the policymakers are good. To learn more, click on this link
President Obama, through executive order, established the Affirmatively Forwarding Fair Housing rule. This initiative would make communities that accepted certain grants (aka bribes) to inventory their communities to determine the community’s ethnic and economic diversity, and unless appropriately balanced, as determined by the federal government, do whatever is necessary to create the desired ethnic and economic balance of the citizens within that community.
Using the following excerpt from HUD’s own website, you can see just how micro managed a community would become once it took the bait (aka grant).
The AFFH focuses program participants’ analysis on four primary goals: improving integrated living patterns and overcoming historic patterns of segregation; reducing racial and ethnic concentrations of poverty; reducing disparities by race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, or disability in access to community assets such as education, transit access, and employment, as well as exposure to environmental health hazards and other stressors that harm a person’s quality of life; and responding to disproportionate housing needs by protected class.
This insane social engineering/social justice experiment, which would create total chaos within the targeted community, would likely never occur without the grants/bribes offered to the community leaders by our bankrupt federal government. The best way to stop it, if our federal legislators have the political will, is to prevent the funding of the Affirmatively Forwarding Fair Housing initiative.
As the title of this article indicates, the Gosar Amendment, which is designed to block any funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development to enforce the AFFH rule, has made it through the House. We must now provide the push to force the Senate to pass the bill. To read more, click on this link.
We in the United States realize that many of our laws are affected by the crazy legal precedents established in California. This is certainly the case with all things environmental. Californians are infamous for going overboard to protect the environment. That makes them especially easy targets for a scam like sustainable development. That is why it comes as no surprise that California, especially around the San Francisco Bay Area, is currently the poster child for pack and stack building where living in multi-family housing, walking, bike-riding, or taking public transit to work are being forced on the citizens. In this August 6, 2013 article the citizens tell how their efforts to stop these restrictive measures have fallen on deaf ears, and that they, with the help of the Pacific Legal Fund plan to fight back. Please click the link to learn more about what will be your future if sustainable development is not stopped. link
What do you get when the media and a portion of the scientific community goes totally in the tank for President Obama and the Progressives in D.C. (formerly known as the Democratic Party)? Why a scam called Global Warming/Climate Change, of course. A scam that will provide the reason to collect more money for the left in the form of a carbon tax, as well as create mountains of regulations forcing “the transformation of society”. Who cares if the data doesn’t forward the narrative.
The October 2, 2013 article tells how, after the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) released its latest warning about “catastrophic” climate change on Sept. 27, all three broadcast networks that night fell over each other to sound the alarm of the danger of Global Warming. CBS even aired a claim about temperatures rising “more than 200 degrees.” link
Below is the first paragraph in an article posted by Jay on September 25, 2013 at grassrootjournal.com. Within this paragraph are a series of statements that reveal a common misconception about unratified treaties.
The paragraph reads,
Secretary of State John Kerry has signed the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty. What that means is simple enough: the Obama Administration is trying for an end-run around the Senate on gun control, even though the treaty requires the support of two-thirds of the Senate in order to be ratified. The treaty will fail because Obama doesn’t have the votes to ratify it; what’s more telling is the fact that John Kerry still went ahead to sign it anyways.
If you have read Lesson 1 at this website, you are aware that Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Treaty were never ratified by the Senate, yet they are currently wrecking havoc on the American way of life because once a treaty is signed, it can then be implemented by Executive Order. It is painfully obvious that President Obama has employed the Executive Order at an alarming rate. Why would anyone doubt on an issue as important gun control is to the establishment of a One World Order, that he would not use an E.O. for this? To read more, click on this link.
This article has been written by Dr. Michael Coffman. The same Dr. Coffman who showed the Biodiversity/Wildlands Project map to the Senate in 1994, and by so doing, stopped the ratification of the Biodiversity Treaty. This article explains why moving the American citizen, or any other country’s citizens, into pack-n-stack living conditions in the human settlements is not a good thing either for the citizen or the environment. Hence the name Smart Growth Fraud. link
Strategies that Will Help You Stop Agenda 21 from Destroying our Representative Republic
We can hope that the politicians, with no push from the people, will on their own find out, learn about, and address Sustainable Development through appropriate legislation. If hoping for something worked, we would all have won million dollar lotteries by now. No, hoping isn’t the answer. Continue reading →
Leaked documents obtained by The Associated Press show there are deep concerns among governments around the globe over how to address the issue ahead of next week’s meeting of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. There seems to be a problem with the data (would say the liberal) or maybe there is a problem with the theory (would say the conservative).
The warming of the globe is slowing even though man continues to burn fossil fuels and cut down forests. To read more about how those in the tank for global warming will try to twist the data to suit their need to ultimately (in 2015) adopt a global climate treaty click on this link.
How, Through Education, the American Citizen is being Dummied Down and Trained to be a Cog in the Centralized Industrial Machine of a One World Government.
I doubt that many people today believe that in America we have a strong, successful educational system. Yes, most would agree that there are many places where we could improve the system. Continue reading →